The Deepwater Horizon spill of 2010 was the worst oil spill in U.S. history. But a new study suggests it was much worse than had been thought, unleashing “toxic and invisible” oil into the Gulf of Mexico.
Co-author of the study, Igal Berenshtein of the University of Miami, said in a statement:
“According to our findings, the toxic extent of the spill may have been as much as 30 percent larger than satellite data previously estimated.”
The findings exposed that a substantial part of the spill was undetectable to satellites, and yet toxic to marine wildlife.
The Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded on April 20, 2010, killing 11 people and releasing 210 million gallons of crude oil into the Gulf of Mexico for a total of 87 days. Oil slicks from the blowout covered an area estimated at 57,000 square miles.
RELATED STORY:
Study lead author Claire Paris, also of the University of Miami, and Berenshtein, stated:
“While the Deepwater Horizon oil spill has been extensively studied, several fundamental questions remained unanswered. What was the full extent of the oil spill? Does the satellite footprint account for the entire oil spill extent? And is there a part of the spill that extends beyond the satellite footprint but is still toxic to marine animals?”
Satellites are how researchers track oil spills like the Deepwater Horizon, but this method often miscalculates the spill’s actual environmental damage. The scientists in this study used three-dimensional computer simulations and previously published on-site measurements to focus on the oil that was invisible to satellites but toxic to organisms. Berenshtein in a statement:
“We found that there was a substantial fraction of oil invisible to satellites and aerial imaging. The spill was only visible to satellites above a certain oil concentration at the surface, leaving a portion unaccounted for.”
RELATED STORY:
The new findings revealed a much wider area of the spill beyond what could be seen by satellites, showing it reached the Texas shore, the Florida Keys, and even along the east coast of Florida into the Gulf Stream.
It was also toxic enough to kill approximately half of the marine life in its path.
The new findings will be necessary for environmental health during future oil spills, according to the study. The authors stated:
“We recommend this method as complementary to satellite estimates. Currently, satellites provide the most rapid and accurate indication of the locations of the oil slicks. But the oil spill also extends in the water column where currents are (separated) from the upper circulation.”
The authors concluded in the study that the new method is “especially important given the global increase in deep-sea drilling efforts and petroleum-related activities.”
The study was published in the peer-reviewed journal Science Advances.
